<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LearningReImagined &#187; passive educators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learningreimagined.com/category/passive-educators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learningreimagined.com</link>
	<description>A New Schools of Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Can we fundamentally reinvent schools or a school?</title>
		<link>http://learningreimagined.com/2009/04/can-we-fundamentally-reinvent-schools-or-a-school/</link>
		<comments>http://learningreimagined.com/2009/04/can-we-fundamentally-reinvent-schools-or-a-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott McLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsolete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passive educators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recreate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FundamentalChange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learningreimagined.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I listened to a podcast yesterday, part of a series called &#8220;4 Guys Talking&#8221;. I was drawn to it because I&#8217;ve been following Scott McLeod&#8217;s blog for some time and he&#8217;s got some interesting ideas. While he was reading The Game of School, for example, he posted thought-provoking quotes from the book. The &#8220;4 guys&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: georgia;">I listened to a <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/uceacastle/2009/04/01/4-Guys-Talking-Episode-3" target="_blank">podcast</a> yesterday, part of a series called &#8220;4 Guys Talking&#8221;. I was drawn to it because I&#8217;ve been following Scott McLeod&#8217;s blog for some time and he&#8217;s got some interesting ideas. While he was reading <em>The Game of School, </em>for example, he posted thought-provoking quotes from the book. The &#8220;4 guys&#8221; talk about education, technology, K-12 schools, and higher education. The description is: &#8220;Four guys talking about education, technology, leadership, K-12 schools, and/or higher education. Drs. Scott McLeod (Iowa State U.), Jon Becker (Virginia Commonwealth U.), David Quinn (U. Florida), and Jayson Richardson (UNC-Wilmington).&#8221; What interested me was the question posed in the beginning by the host: Can we fundamentally reinvent schools or a school?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: georgia;">Interestingly, they seem to conclude that it ain&#8217;t gonna happen in any widespread way in current schools. They note that successful schools with new approaches tend to be charter schools, schools that started from the beginning with a focus (high tech school in Philly), public charter schools or magnet schools. The rest seem hopelessly locked into the old model.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: georgia;">They also observed that if leaders (boards, superintendents, principals, teacher leaders) don&#8217;t get it, it ain&#8217;t gonna happen. Additionally, teachers obviously have a choice to get on board or not, complicating and compromising rapid movement. If they choose not to, then principals have the task of getting them out of the way by helping them find different assignments—not an easy task. There are, after all, parents, teachers, and students that want worksheet schools and they should have them—just as we who want something more technological, problem-based, or project-based should have the freedom and encouragement to organize around what we see as important.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: georgia;">Their thinking has helped me conclude a little more firmly that change—necessary, quick, and fundamental—is not possible with current thinking. Many good and decent people have been at it a long time. Yet schools haven&#8217;t changed much. It looks easier to destroy the system and rebuild another more organic, loosely coupled, system of learning environments (formerly known as schools). And I&#8217;m increasingly ok with it, given the destruction to the human spirit that the current system causes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: georgia;">You may want to check out the podcasts. The question upfront helps you decide if the broad cast is worthwhile, so it doesn&#8217;t have to be a time waster.<br />
</span></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=498724d2-c2c9-8f95-b98b-da5655f6a2c4" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learningreimagined.com/2009/04/can-we-fundamentally-reinvent-schools-or-a-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Sense of Urgency is MIA</title>
		<link>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/09/a-sense-of-urgency-is-mia/</link>
		<comments>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/09/a-sense-of-urgency-is-mia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passive educators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learningreimagined.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to a meeting this week about the future of a project that is about 8 years old. The project, working with teachers to organize staff and improve schools by introducing key readings, new protocols and practices, and networking with one another, is at the beginning stage of planning this year’s program. At the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">I went to a meeting this week about the future of a project that is about 8 years old. The project, working with teachers to organize staff and improve schools by introducing key readings, new protocols and practices, and networking with one another, is at the beginning stage of planning this year’s program. At the meeting were union people, policy people, some private sector folks and an assortment of others interested in bettering public education.</span></p>
<div class="entrytext">
<p>I’ve been thinking this over for some days now because I left somewhat dissatisfied. And here’s the crux of it for me. I’ve always liked the phrase, “Think globally, act locally.”. Here we were thinking of doing a program around the theme of learning communities when I said, “How the hell are we going to build learning communities if we lose 50% of new teachers in the first 5 years? And have you seen the figures on what losing teachers costs the districts in recruiting and other services to replace those departing teachers?”</p>
<p>We know that attrition can be reduced greatly with support. So, in every school there is a program to help new teachers acclimate, find resources, help with routines and listen—right? And the answer from my colleagues was a resounding “No! Such programs are the exception, not the rule.” It’s incomprehensible to me why this is the case. It borders on malfeasance or malpractice. If we did help new teachers and cut the rate of leaving teachers locally, wouldn’t we save money (to allocate to learning), cut the national rate of teachers giving up, and enable (at least possibly) the development of learning communities?</p>
<p>The answer to me is clear. And there are other answers that would accrue to the profession, learning experiences, finances, and morale if we began to think more forthrightly about schools and the context we’re in nationally and internationally.</p>
<p>I discovered in the process of thinking about this, however, a much more troubling attitude. And I’ll have more to say about that tomorrow.</p>
<p>Special thanks to Bill and our conversation this morning for getting me going again.</p>
<p>In the meantime, let me know what you think. Why do we educators act so passively about problems we know how to solve?</p>
<p>Nameste.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/09/a-sense-of-urgency-is-mia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaming the system and the Real purpose of learning</title>
		<link>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/05/gaming-the-system-and-the-real-purpose-of-learning/</link>
		<comments>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/05/gaming-the-system-and-the-real-purpose-of-learning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blue Skunk Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerously Irrelevant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott McLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passive educators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purpose of learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recreate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learningreimagined.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two news articles grabbed me by the collar and got in my face. The first one, &#8220;How to cheat, courtesy of YouTube&#8220;, discusses common ways students &#8220;cheat&#8221; on tests, some featured on YouTube. At one point in the article a guidance counselor from Ohio asks, &#8220;What is that saying about our students and our society?&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two news articles grabbed me by the collar and got in my face. The first one, &#8220;<a href="http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/19210799.html">How to cheat, courtesy of YouTube</a>&#8220;, discusses common ways students &#8220;cheat&#8221; on tests, some featured on YouTube. At one point in the article a guidance counselor from Ohio asks, &#8220;What is that saying about our students and our society?&#8221; Here&#8217;s what I think. It&#8217;s saying that school is a game and that some of the students have found a way to &#8220;game&#8221; the system with some success. I don&#8217;t think it cheating any more than cramming irrelevant stuff into a kids head is. And that&#8217;s the pity—so much time wasted in foolishness. Doug Johnson over at <a href="http://doug-johnson.squarespace.com/blue-skunk-blog/">The Blue Skunk Blog</a> muses in &#8220;Ruminate&#8221; about finding time to think deeply and has some good suggestions. Thinking about Doug&#8217;s blog and the article about &#8220;cheating&#8221; I wonder how we can make time in schools for quiet, reflective, deep thinking for ourselves and the students. It may be impossible given their structure, culture and history.</p>
<p>Tom Friedman&#8217;s May 21st <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/opinion/21friedman.html">opinion</a> piece in the <em>New York Times</em> really roughed me up as well. Let me explain. Scott McLeod also posted a very interesting question that day: <a href="http://www.dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/05/so-what-if-scho.html">So what if schools don’t prepare kids for the 21st century?</a> The discussion that followed was rich and insightful. I&#8217;ve been chewing on both pieces for over a week now. Friedman writes about the huge transfer of wealth underway to the &#8220;petro-authoritarian states&#8221;. The implications are chilling. He ends with a quote from David Rothkopf, author of <em>Superclass:</em> &#8221;“Call it the triple deficit. A fiscal deficit that will soon have us choosing between rationed health care, sufficient education, adequate infrastructure and traditional levels of defense spending, a trade deficit that has us borrowing from our rivals to the point of real vulnerability, and a geopolitical deficit that is a legacy of Iraq, which may result in hesitancy to take strong stands where we must.”</p>
<p>I think these two posts are inextricably intertwined. Learning in this society needs to be first class for ALL students. There needs to be many kinds of &#8220;schools&#8221;—not the one model we have now. It&#8217;s all hands on deck—we need all the talent and creativity we can find to face the reality of the swiftly and fundamentally changing world. But it is way easier to drift along thinking we&#8217;re the best, the strongest, the richest and that&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s intended to be. Wake up and don&#8217;t go back to sleep!</p>
<p>The breeze at dawn has secrets to tell you. </p>
<p><em>                                                                                    Don’t go back to sleep. </em></p>
<p>You must ask for what you really want. </p>
<p><em>                                                                                    Don’t go back to sleep. </em></p>
<p><em></em></p>
<p>People are going back and forth across the doorsill </p>
<p><em>                                                                                    where the two worlds touch. </em></p>
<p>The door is round and open. </p>
<p><strong>                                                   Don’t go back to sleep</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>  — </em>Jelaluddin Rumi </span></strong></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/05/gaming-the-system-and-the-real-purpose-of-learning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where is the Courage to ReImagine?</title>
		<link>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/05/where-is-the-courage-to-reimagine/</link>
		<comments>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/05/where-is-the-courage-to-reimagine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shirky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passive educators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learningreimagined.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much has been written about the necessity of changing schools. There have been myriad books, articles, commissions, special studies and yet schools remain essentially the same as when my father went to school in the early part of the 20th century. For my part, I&#8217;ve indicated in previous posts that the institution is impervious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much has been written about the necessity of changing schools. There have been myriad books, articles, commissions, special studies and yet schools remain essentially the same as when my father went to school in the early part of the 20th century. For my part, I&#8217;ve indicated in previous posts that the institution is impervious to change—it is tightly locked in place. And no amount of energy, no concentration of good and persuasive ideas, no research or no insightful, no cosmetic structural changes, and well-meaning leader is going to change the institution.</p>
<p>Educators seem powerless to change things, except for a few shining examples, too few in a nation of about 14,000 school districts. For many staff and students, schools remain spirit killers of the highest order. In my view, there is so much creative energy being wasted in the system we cannot possibly realize widespread success preparing our kids for the 21st century. And we&#8217;re not outraged, we&#8217;re not angry (even a little)—we are resigned. And so the tragedy continues unabated.</p>
<p>There is a wonderful example posted over at <a href="http://www.dangerouslyirrelevant.org/">Dangerously Irrelevant</a> about kids having the energy, gumption, and courage to stand together as a group to make a statement. <a href="http://www.dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/05/compare-and-c-1.html">The story</a> involves kids who handed in blank test papers as a protest. A telling quote in the story by Johnny Cruz captures just one aspect of the school tragedy: &#8220;They don&#8217;t think we have brains of our own, like we&#8217;re robots.&#8221; Just follow the instructions and don&#8217;t ask questions no matter how meaningless and inane the experience is.</p>
<p>While reading Clay Shirkey&#8217;s <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594201536?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=learnireimag-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=1594201536">Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=learnireimag-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=1594201536" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></em>, I began to wonder why educators—smart, well-read, articulate, techno-savvy—don&#8217;t act more like the kids who handed in blank test papers. Why aren&#8217;t we using the new smart tools like flash mobs and meet-ups to begin the hard part of turning all the books, articles, etc into a wave of change? Why don&#8217;t educators flash mob a school board or a PTO meeting? Why don&#8217;t the kids flash mob faculty meetings? Where are the meet-ups of citizens, educators, business people, and students reading, discussing, and developing the case and specifics for reforms? All of these can contribute to getting glimpses of what the future holds.</p>
<p>Too radical? What if a school planned a year-long dialogue with parents, community leaders, educators and others about how drastically &#8220;school&#8221; needs to change? Readings could be posted ahead of time on the school website (or linked from there) and real &#8220;fierce conversations&#8221; could ensue.</p>
<p>And what if other topics were discussed, openly. Suppose the school could be the center of a discussion about getting others in the community involved with quality and excellence in learning. Or how do we deal with doing more with fewer monetary resources?</p>
<p>I simply think it is time to go on the offensive, on the ground, and quit being so damned passive. If conversations are king, we clearly need to get going and engage the community!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learningreimagined.com/2008/05/where-is-the-courage-to-reimagine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

